Remove Information Remove Negative Screening Remove Waste
article thumbnail

List of Clean 200 companies captures the green transition in full flight

Corporate Knights

More evidence that the future belongs to anyone who will put in the work.

article thumbnail

Clean 200 list shows sustainable companies on path to dominate global economy

Corporate Knights

The industrial sector accounts for 52 companies on the list , followed by information technology (32), and consumer discretionary and materials (29 each). . $10,000 invested in the Clean200 on July 1, 2016, would have grown to $29,090 by January 29, 2025 , versus $17,670 for the MSCI ACWI/Energy benchmark for fossil fuel.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

SMEs Can Turn Ambition Into Action With SAP Product Footprint Management for Clean Operations

3BL Media

What’s more, investors are now going beyond “negative screening” and actively backing businesses that are leaders in sustainability, in pursuit of above-market returns. The low-cost, low-effort solution streamlines and simplifies carbon management, from raw materials and production to consumption, waste prevention, and recycling.

article thumbnail

Take Five: Future-proofing to the Fore

Chris Hall

The firm issued a no action challenge on grounds of micromanagement to a resolution seeking information on the expected impact of climate-related pricing and coverage decisions on the sustainability of its homeowners insurance customer base under a range of climate scenarios. perhaps reflects the scale of the challenges.

article thumbnail

These 200 companies are leading the clean economy in 2023

Corporate Knights

Of the 2023 Clean200 companies, the information technology sector accounted for nearly a quarter of the total sustainable revenue at $586 billion, followed by the communications services sector ($542 billion) and the industrials sector ($400 billion). Apple and Alphabet, as last year, ranked first and second, respectively.

Banking 333
article thumbnail

ESG Investing Needs to Expand Its Definition of Materiality

Stanford Social Innovation

In its most simplified form, ESG investing is “negative screening”—not investing in companies with harmful practices or actively engaging company leadership to change those practices—whereas impact investing refers to investments made with the intention to create measurable positive impact alongside financial return.