This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

What a catastrophic gas leak in Pennsylvania means for our climate and health

EDF  Energy Exchange's picture
Blog, Environmental Defense Fund

EDF's energy experts discuss how to accelerate the transition to a clean, low-carbon energy economy. Guided by science and economics, EDF tackles urgent threats with practical solutions. Founded...

  • Member since 2018
  • 1,063 items added with 1,026,956 views
  • Nov 22, 2022
  • 468 views

By EDF Blogs

Image credit: Methane plume from the leak captured by the Sentinel-2 satellite on 9 November (data processed by UNEP/IMEO)

By Adam Peltz and Jon Goldstein

A natural gas storage site in Western Pennsylvania has sprung a massive gas leak that’s impacting both the climate and the communities who live in Cambria County. 

The leak began Thursday, Nov. 6 at a facility operated by Equitrans Midstream Corporation.  Despite efforts from the company and state officials, it has continued for weeks – causing over 1 billion cubic feet of methane and other pollutants to fill the air.  Its impact is massive – large enough to be seen and quantified from space from the growing network of methane satellites. The near-term warming generated from this single site over the course of a few weeks is roughly equivalent to emissions from 360,000 cars over a year.  

It’s also an incredible waste of energy. The gas lost from this one leak could have met the annual natural gas usage needs of 15,000 homes and is worth $6.5 million. 

The gas leak is one of the largest we’ve seen in the U.S. since the Aliso Canyon disaster in 2015. That months-long disaster spurred the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to issue national standards for underground natural gas storage facilities. Those standards followed the guidelines of the American Petroleum Institute – and went into effect essentially unmodified with little transparency. And now, history has repeated itself.  The fact that we keep seeing these problems erupt at this scale  every few years demonstrates that we need to do a better job managing these massive climate and safety threats. 

So what does that entail?  

The rules PHMSA put forward have significant shortcomings. There were no standards for measuring risk or quantifying risk reduction. There were no specific requirements to evaluate and eliminate single points of failure. Well control planning details were scant. And there was little detail on emergency preparedness, safety, site security and other elements. In light of yet another gas storage disaster, it’s clear these problems need to be fixed through comprehensive regulations and not just industry guidelines (though improved guidelines incorporating EDF input are expected next year). And in addition to stronger rules, PHMSA – a small federal agency with important responsibilities – must step up enforcement and inspections to ensure industry is doing its job.

While an overhaul of underground natural gas storage rules and oversight related to well integrity is necessary to prevent disasters of this sort, a new set of oil and gas standards from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will help reduce the oil and gas industry’s methane pollution problem more broadly. Recently proposed updates to the nation’s methane rules would require oil and gas companies to regularly check facilities for leaks or problems at upstream and midstream facilities, including in the storage segment like this one in Pennsylvania. A newly enacted methane fee in the Inflation Reduction Act will also provide a strong economic disincentive for operators to allow problems at their facilities. 

Governor Wolf and Governor-elect Shapiro have both been supporters of stronger standards around oil and gas methane emissions, not only because of the impact these emissions have on the climate but also because what they mean for the state’s air quality. Methane is emitted along with a host of other pollutants that are linked to cancer, respiratory illness and smog-formation. 

Unfortunately, just recently, the Pennsylvania House Environmental Resources & Energy Committee, chaired by Rep. Daryl Metcalf, voted to stall an effort to try and prevent this pollution.

The ongoing disaster in Cambria County underscores we need more pollution protections on the oil and gas industry, not less. Pennsylvania lawmakers and federal regulators need to up their game and adopt standards that can protect the climate, stop waste and save lives. 

Discussions

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

EDF  Energy Exchange's picture
Thank EDF for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network® is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »