Climate Politics: The View from Washington

The original of this article was posted on my website Civil Notion.

Dominating politics this week is the war in the Middle East between Israel and the terrorist group Hamas, in which thousands have died and many more have been wounded. Israel's far-right Prime Minister Netanyahu has promised a scorched earth retaliation against Hamas and other terrorist groups like the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. It appears that both Israel and Hamas are prepared for a long war.

As with all wars, it's the innocent—on both sides—who will suffer the most. The Gaza Strip "is home to at least 2.3 million people, considered one of the most densely populated places on Earth. Israeli officials declared a "complete siege" of Gaza, cutting off water, food and power supplies."

Thanks for reading Civil Notion! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Subscribed

The war is roiling the energy sector. The price of petroleum is rising towards $100/barrel. Analysts say the crisis "could have disastrous consequences for the U.S. economy." The price rise will contribute to inflation and could lead to an economic slump in the U.S. and elsewhere in the world.

Republicans in Washington are using the crisis to attack President Biden for his decision to release $6 billion in oil revenues to Iran for humanitarian purposes and the return of five Iranian prisoners facing charges in the U.S. The source of the $6 billion are funds that South Korea owed Iran for oil it purchased "before the Trump administration imposed sanctions on such transactions in 2019."

Spokesmen for the administration have stated that none of the funds have been spent. National Security Council spokesman John Kirby has said that "the funds that were moved to Qatar would have 'more legal restrictions' than in South Korea and that the U.S. would have oversight about where the money is being spent." 

Ousted Speaker McCarthy set the tone of Republican attacks on President Biden that should be expected to continue over the coming days and weeks. The former speaker said: "Rather than focus on his Green New Deal, he [Biden] should be focused on protecting Americans."

Both Democrats and Republicans have urged Biden to do more to prevent the sale of Iranian oil, especially to China. A bipartisan group of senators has introduced the Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum (SHIP) Act. The bill, whose sponsors include Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Maggie Hassan (D-NH), would sanction anyone assisting Iran to export its oil. A companion bill sponsored by Representatives Mike Lawler (R-NY) and Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) has been introduced in the House.

The ousting of McCarthy as speaker is hampering efforts by Congress to respond to the crisis in the Middle East. No business can be conducted until a new speaker is elected, although committees can still meet. The two candidates who appear to be leading contenders for the job are the current majority leader, Representative Steve Scalise (R-LA), and Jim Jordan (R-H), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

Jordan founded the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus (HFC) and was part of the group that booted McCarthy from the speaker's chair. He's been endorsed by the leader of the pack of eight, Matt Gaetz (R-FL). Scalise is among the most conservative members of the Republican House conference.

At this point, whether Jordan or Scalise can secure the needed 217 votes to gain the speakership is unclear. It's not anticipated that a new speaker will be chosen before the end of this week. Much will depend upon what the 210 Republican representatives who voted to keep McCarthy as speaker will do. Although unable to elect a speaker, they can certainly stand in the way of anointing a member of the HFC.

It's critical to remember that Congress is facing a deadline of November 17th to pass F.Y. 2024 appropriations or face the shutdown of the federal government. The government is currently operating under a continuing resolution. McCarthy's support for the resolution led to his ouster. A harder-line conservative speaker, e.g., Jordan or Scalise, is unlikely to care whether the government stays open.

The objective of those on the far right is all about chaos rather than compromise. It's a goal shared by the former president. As if things couldn't get weirder than they already are, Trump has been talked about as a candidate for the speakership. There's no requirement that the leader of the House must be a member of it. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) supports the idea and has been quoted as saying: "If Trump becomes Speaker of the House, the House chamber will be like a Trump rally every day!!"

Fortunately, it will never be. Not only has Trump indicated that he has a campaign to win, but the rules of the House are that no indicted individual can be speaker. McCarthy has recently indicated that he would be willing to re-take the speakership if other candidates cannot garner the needed votes. It's a reversal of the position he took following his ouster. Should that occur, it's reasonable to assume that he would continue to be under the thumb of the gang of eight that engineered his exit.

The failure of House Republicans to elect a new speaker could lead to a bipartisan solution to the problem. A deal between the Democrats and moderate Republicans could be struck in several ways. A moderate candidate like Tom Emmer (R-MN) could be nominated and elected. Although a much less likely possibility, the Minority Leader of the House, Hakeem Jefferies (D-NY), could also be elected with the help of a half dozen or so Republicans. Stranger things have happened.