This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

Green Breakdown--The Coming Renewable Energy Failure

image credit: Cartoon owned by Steve Goreham
Steve Goreham's picture
Speaker, Author, and Researcher, New Lenox Books

  Steve Goreham is a speaker, author, and researcher on environmental issues and a former engineer and business executive.  He is a frequently invited guest on radio and television and a...

  • Member since 2013
  • 41 items added with 59,283 views
  • Aug 23, 2023
  • 664 views

Originally published in Master Resource.

Do you think that wind, solar, and batteries can replace the hydrocarbon fuels that power our modern industrialized society? A new book, Green Breakdown, shows why the Net Zero agenda—a forced transition to renewable energy—is costly, dangerous, and destined for failure. Using science, economics, and in-depth analysis, the book exposes the weaknesses in the planned green energy transition and predicts a coming renewable energy failure.

Green Breakdown is a complete discussion of all facets of the proposed renewable transition, including power plants, home appliances, electric vehicles, ships, aircraft, heavy industry, carbon capture and storage, and the hydrogen economy. Charts, graphs, and references to numerous studies are used to support the analysis. At the same time, the large collection of cartoons, images, and quotes grabs the attention of the reader.

From the Green Breakdown introduction:

“An engineer who attended one of my recent presentations told me his wife had returned her electric vehicle (EV) to Tesla, the manufacturer. Her EV would not charge during the cold Cleveland winter of January 2022. Also in January, more than 100 insurance companies sued Texas electrical grid operator ERCOT because of the grid failure that happened in February 2021 due to the cold weather. The failure resulted in hundreds of deaths and tens of billions of dollars in damages. Former Swiss Environmental Minister Simonetta Sommaruga, seeking ways to reduce energy use, recently advised people to ‘shower together.’ These examples point to growing problems with the world’s rush to transition to renewable energy.”

Use this link to read the rest of the book’s introduction: Introduction.pdf (secureserver.net)

Green Breakdown alerts the reader to these and other questions:

  • After almost $4 trillion spent globally on renewable energy from 2000 to 2018, why were coal, oil, and natural gas still providing 81 percent of world energy in 2018, the same share as in 1991?
  • If electricity produced by wind and solar is cheaper, why do Denmark and Germany, the European nations with the most wind and solar capacity per person, have the highest electricity prices?
  • Since electricity produced by burning biomass emits at least 50 percent more carbon dioxide per megawatt of power than burning coal, why is biomass considered zero emissions?
  • If global warming makes storms more frequent, why does data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration show that hurricane land falls in the United States have been slightly declining since 1850?
  • Since less than five watt-hours of every million watt-hours of US electricity consumption are stored in grid-scale batteries, how can batteries solve the problem of wind and solar intermittency?

Here is text from the conclusion of Chapter 10 of Green Breakdown, which is titled “Energy Crisis and the Seeds of Failure”:

“Output from nuclear power grew rapidly from 1956 to 1980. Leaders projected that nuclear would become the dominant source of global electricity. But the nuclear industry ran into cost, safety, and waste concerns as it grew larger. Similarly, wind, solar, and EVs have grown quickly and are projected to dominate the world’s energy systems. When energy sources are small, they can grow rapidly with little negative effect on the overall energy system. But as they grow larger, negative side effects can slow and then halt penetration.

Wind and solar now face mounting problems with poor electrical power reliability from intermittency, local opposition to vast land requirements, transmission infrastructure shortages, and rising electricity bills for rate payers. Electric vehicles encounter rising battery metal costs and charging issues. Biofuels require increasing amounts of land and provide negligible emissions reductions. Accelerating demands for mined metals and rising end-of-life wastes for wind, solar, and EVs sprout as major cost and environmental issues. The push for carbon capture and hydrogen fuel faces insurmountable cost, transport, and scale barriers. With all these problems and the negative side effects, the transition to renewable energy is headed for failure.”

Green Breakdown, like my other books, contains many quotes from scientists, political and business leaders, environmental groups, the United Nations, and other organizations. My website contains an updated list of more than 800 eco-quotes in 37 categories, compiled from the four books. You can find this eco-quote list here: Eco-Quotes – Steve Goreham

Here are a few quote examples from the website:

“Utah School Gives Kids ‘Disgusting’ Insects to Eat in Class for Climate Assignment on Cows Killing Earth” Fox News, Mar. 6, 2023

“Increased levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) have helped boost green foliage across the world’s arid regions over the last 30 years through a process called CO2 fertilization, according to CSIRO research.” —Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, July 3, 2013

“Bill Gates Issued a Stark Warning for the World: ‘As Awful as This Pandemic is, Climate Change Could be Worse'” Business Insider, Aug. 5, 2020

“Adults keep saying, ‘We owe it to the young people to give them hope.’ But I don’t want your hope. I don’t want you to be hopeful. I want you to panic. I want you to feel the fear that I fear every day. And then I want you to act. I want you to act as if you would in a crisis. I want you to act as if the house was on fire because it is.” —Greta Thunberg, panel presentation at the World Economic Forum, Jan. 25, 2019

“California Asks Residents Not to Charge Electric Vehicles, Days After Announcing Gas Car Ban” MyStateLine.com, Aug. 31, 2022

“We have arrived at a moment of decision. Our home—Earth—is in danger. What is at risk of being destroyed is not the planet itself, of course, but the conditions that have made it hospitable for human beings.” —Al Gore, former US Vice President, statement to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Jan. 28, 2009

“Swedish Scientist Advocates Eating Humans to Combat Climate Change,” “After Söderlund’s presentation, 8% of the audience raised their hands when asked if they would be willing to try human flesh.” Think Big, Sep. 8, 2019

Green Breakdown is now available from Amazon or bookstores. Ebooks are available from Amazon, Apple, Google, and Barnes and Noble. You can receive a signed copy if you buy from my website: Steve Goreham

Please pick up a copy of Green Breakdown and learn the likely future of the demanded energy transition.

Steve Goreham is a professional speaker, researcher, independent columnist, and the author of four books on energy, sustainability, climate change, and public policy.

Discussions
Jeffery Green's picture
Jeffery Green on Aug 24, 2023
  • Renewable energy is growing quite profoundly. If we don't grow RE, we lose our chance for lesser consequences of global warming. Steve Gorham is also a climate denier. I watched in Chicago Steve  sing the praises of more co2 in the air.
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • After almost $4 trillion spent globally on renewable energy from 2000 to 2018, why were coal, oil, and natural gas still providing 81 percent of world energy in 2018, the same share as in 1991?

Six Myths About Renewable Energy - WSJ

 

Steve Goreham's picture
Steve Goreham on Aug 24, 2023

Hi Jeffery.  Thanks for your challenging comments.  However, capacity means little.  Every year, global energy consumption increases by about a United Kingdom worth of additional consumption.  Renewables have never been able to even provide for the annual increase in energy consumption, let alone replace the energy provided by traditional sources.

 

 

Helmut Frik's picture
Helmut Frik on Aug 25, 2023

This or next year it is expeced to grow, since exponential growth of solar and wind keeps going on. Also It looks like you used primary energy again, which underestimats wind and solar roughly by factor 3 bcause they deliver end energy directly. Hydro and biomass are also missing. 

Jeffery Green's picture
Jeffery Green on Aug 24, 2023

 

Climate denial is a dangerous thing especially in this time of more advanced anthropogenic climate change. Fossil fuels would be wise to look at transition out of burning and into renewable energy.

Steve Goreham's picture
Steve Goreham on Aug 24, 2023

Jeffery,

Many people believe that if we change light bulbs we can save polar bears; that if we drive electric cars we can stop the oceans from rising; and if we put up thousands of wind turbines we can make storms less frequent and less severe.  But there is no empirical evidence to support any of these beliefs.

Best, Steve

Mark Silverstone's picture
Mark Silverstone on Aug 25, 2023

The vast amount of empirical data - experimental, historical, modeling - on ghg emissions causing climate change is too easily available for you not to be aware of it by now,  except if you simply don’t want to know.  I and others have pointed you to the information on these pages. 
I understand that the disinformation you spread serves your purposes. You’ve got a good gig going.
 

Just one blatant  example of your disinformation:
It is indeed strange that the person in Cleveland returned her Tesla, while well over half of new cars in Norway are EVs, including those above the Arctic Circle, and work perfectly well in routine far sub-zero deg F temperature conditions.

Shame on you.

T Conroy's picture
T Conroy on Aug 25, 2023

Steve, a good article with important points to consider. The responses you are getting I would characterize as "we must do anything and everything, including the ineffective spending of trillions driven by political processes". As a result, to date we only see increasing CO2 emissions both from the U.S. and globally, and we are incidentally impoverishing millions or billions around the world.

All serious economists seem to agree that a globally-imposed carbon tax (revenue neutral) is the only serious way to attempt to achieve atmospheric CO2 reduction. Unfortunately, our politicians, beginning in the Obama administration, instead have chosen subsidy policies that often benefit the very rich (Eg. electric vehicle and rooftop solar systems) as the best political pathway. These policies are not demonstrating any level of success to date. 

Now I await the expected response: "if we just wait a bit and spend more and more trillions we WILL start to achieve global CO2 reductions....trust me!"

Steve Goreham's picture
Thank Steve for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network® is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »